首页> 外文OA文献 >Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma
【2h】

Five-year extension of a clinical trial comparing the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma

机译:比较EX-PRESS青光眼滤过器和小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼的五年临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared the efficacy of the EX-PRESS(®) glaucoma filtration device and trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma up to five years after surgery. Patients from a previously reported randomized, open-label, parallel-arm clinical trial in which 78 patients received either the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device or underwent a trabeculectomy were followed for up to an additional four years (five total) beyond the original study (39 eyes per treatment group). Risk-benefit data were obtained for up to five years after glaucoma surgery. Outcome variables were intraocular pressures and intraocular pressure medications. Complete success was denoted by intraocular pressure values ≤ 18 mmHg without medication. The EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device controlled intraocular pressure more effectively without medication for more patients from year 1 (86.8% versus 61.5%, P = 0.01) to year 3 (66.7% versus 41.0%, P = 0.02) than trabeculectomy. At year 1, only 12.8% of patients required intraocular pressure medication after EX-PRESS implantation, compared with 35.9% after trabeculectomy. The proportions became closer at year 5 (41% versus 53.9%). The responder rate was higher with EX-PRESS and time to failure was longer. In addition, surgical interventions for complications were fewer after EX-PRESS implantation. This five-year analysis confirmed and extended the results reported after one year. Compared with trabeculectomy, EX-PRESS provided better intraocular pressure control in the first three years, and patients required fewer intraocular pressure medications and fewer surgical interventions during the five-year study period. For patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device, implanted under a superficial scleral flap, produced significantly higher success rates than trabeculectomy. EX-PRESS is an effective device for long-term treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma
机译:这项研究比较了EX-PRESS(®)青光眼滤过器和小梁切除术在原发性开角型青光眼中的效果,直到术后五年。来自先前报道的一项随机,开放标签,平行臂临床试验的患者,其中78名接受EX-PRESS青光眼滤过器或小梁切除术的患者在原始研究后最多随访了四年(共5年) (每个治疗组39眼)。青光眼手术后长达五年的风险收益数据。结果变量是眼压和眼压药物。完全成功由不使用药物的眼内压值≤18 mmHg表示。与小梁切除术相比,从第一年(86.8%对61.5%,P = 0.01)到第三年(66.7%对41.0%,P = 0.02)的更多患者,EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置无需药物即可更有效地控制眼压。在第1年,只有12.8%的患者在EX-PRESS植入后需要眼压药物治疗,而小梁切除术后为35.9%。到第5年,这一比例更加接近(41%对53.9%)。 EX-PRESS的响应率更高,失效时间更长。此外,EX-PRESS植入术后并发症的外科手术更少。这项为期五年的分析证实并延长了一年后报告的结果。与小梁切除术相比,EX-PRESS在前三年提供了更好的眼内压控制,并且在五年研究期间,患者需要的眼内压药物和手术干预更少。对于原发性开角型青光眼患者,EX-PRESS青光眼滤过装置植入巩膜浅表皮瓣下,其成功率明显高于小梁切除术。 EX-PRESS是长期治疗原发性开角型青光眼的有效设备

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号